認知視角下英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的歷時研究
定 價:36 元
- 作者:王錦 著
- 出版時間:2020/9/1
- ISBN:9787567025110
- 出 版 社:中國海洋大學出版社
- 中圖法分類:H314.3
- 頁碼:147
- 紙張:膠版紙
- 版次:1
- 開本:16開
語言在共時層面表現(xiàn)出的差異可以折射出其歷時層面的演變過程!墩J知視角下英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的歷時研究》從認知語言學視角全面系統(tǒng)地研究了英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)從古代英語到中世紀英語、早期現(xiàn)代英語直至當代英語的演變過程。該研究具有歷時語言學和共時語言學的雙重研究價值:在歷時層面上深入研究英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的起源與演變;在共時層面上剖析當代英語的否定結(jié)構(gòu),并對否定結(jié)構(gòu)的習得進行了一定研究。《認知視角下英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的歷時研究》在英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)演變過程中的每個歷史階段,都提供了理論闡釋,并佐以實例印證,從而能夠讓讀者更好地了解《認知視角下英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的歷時研究》的論述內(nèi)容,真實體會英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)發(fā)展演變的過程,了解其發(fā)展初期否定詞詞形千變?nèi)f化和否定句結(jié)構(gòu)復雜多變的原因。
王錦,女,山東濰坊人,1987年5月出生,英語語言文學博士,濰坊學院講師,濰坊學院外國語學院語言對比與翻譯研究所所長,濰坊學院“優(yōu)青計劃”支持人選。主要研究方向為語言對比學翻譯和歷時語言學。主持市級課題2項,校級課題1項,參與省級多項課題。在國內(nèi)外期刊上發(fā)表論文多篇。本研究系濰坊學院2018年博士科研基金項目(從認知角度研究英語否定結(jié)構(gòu)的歷時演變,項目編號2018BS18)階段性成果。
Chapter 1 Introduction
1.1 General Statements
1.2 Literature Review
1.2.1 Generative and Functional Perspectives
1.2.2 Jespersen's Negative Cycle
1.3 Theoretical Background
1.3.1 The Cognitive Prominence Principle
1.3.2 Other Theoretical Rules in Negation
1.4 Typological Checking
1.4.1 Negative Cycle in Germanic Languages
1.4.2 Negative Cycle in Romance Languages
1.5 Organization of the Study
Chapter 2 Negation in Old English and Early Middle English
2.1 Types of Negation.
2.1.1 Negative Concord and Single Negator
2.1.2 Sentence Negation and Constituent Negation
2.1.3 Negative Polarity Items
2.1.4 Negative Coordination
2.1.5 Contrastive Negation
2.1.6 Negation in Complementation
2.1.7 Expletive Negation
2.1.8 Affixal Negation
2.2 Rules of Negation
2.2.1 Negative Incorporation
2.2.2 Negative Attraction
2.2.3 Negative Raising
2.3 Theoretical Explanation
2.3.1 Negation Is Prominent
2.3.2 Reinforcement of the Negator Ne
2.4 Diversities of Negative Forms
2.4.1 Texts, Gemes and Latin Influence
2.4.2 Variation in Old English Syntax
2.5 Summary
Chapter 3 Negation in Late Middle English and Early Modern English
3.1 Major Syntactic Changes
3.1.1 Ne...Not Collocation
3.1.2 Loss of Ne and Negative Concord
3.1.3 The Grammaticalization of Not
3.1.4 The Grammaticalization of Do
3.2 Types and Rules of Negation
3.2.1 Negative Polarity Items
3.2.2 Negative Coordination
3.2.3 Constituent Negation
3.2.4 Expletive Negation
3.2.5 Affixal Negation
3.2.6 Negative Attraction
3.2.7 Negative Raising
3.2.8 Negative Inversion
3.3 Theoretical Explanation
3.3.1 Forward Shifting of Negators
3.3.2 Prominence and Forward Shifting of Negators
3.4 Diversities of Genres, Texts and Manuscripts
3.5 Summary
Chapter 4 Negation in Late Modern English and Present-Day English
4.1 Negation in Late Modern English
4.1.1 Double Negation
4.1.2 Negative Raising
4.1.3 The Cliticization of Not
4.2 Negation in Present-Day English
4.2.1 Sentence Negation and Constiment Negation
4.2.2 Negative Polarity Items
4.2.3 Negative Coordination
4.2.4 The Cliticization of Not
4.2.5 Negative Inversion
4.2.6 Negation and Modality
4.2.7 Emphatic Negation
4.2.8 Affixal Negation
4.3 Learnability of Negation
4.3.1 Negation in First Language Acquisition
4.3.2 The Acquisition of Negation in Second Language Learners
4.3.3 The Acquisition of Negation in Chinese Learners
4.4 Summary
Chapter 5 Conclusion
5.1 Major mdings
5.2 Models of Language Change
5.3 Limitations and Implications
Appendix
References
Postscript
List of Figure
Figure 3.1 Percentage of do forms in different types of sentences
List of Tables
Table 1.1 Jespersen's Negative Cycle according to the author's Summary
Table 1.2 Negative Cycle in German
Table 1.3 Negative Cycle in Dutch and Norwegian
Table 1.4 Negative Cycle in French
Table 2.1 Results on number of negators (%)
Table 3.1 Frequencies of ne and ne...not in early thirteenth century English prose
Table 3.2 Frequencies of ne and ne...not in main and subordinate clauses in Early Modern English prose
Table 3.3 Percentage on number of negators per clause in various texts
Table 3.4 Percentage of ne and not in Middle English verse from 1200 to 1400
Table 3.5 Percentage of ne, ne...not, and not in the PPCMEE2 data
Table 3.6 Percentage of replacement of ne by not and n-item s in Middle English verse from 1200 to 1400
Table 3.7 Presence of a reinforcing negator in early thirteenth century prose
Table 3.8 Inversion with and without not in early thirteenth century prose
Table 3.9 Percentage of multiple negation in Middle English literature